If I understand correctly, this is not a priority. A little earlier, you were blowing both hot and cold. You say that this legislation has worked well over the last 25 years, that Canada was not so bad, that it was one of the top 20 countries in the world, and that, as a result, this legislation represented a good balance. Those are all the expressions you used.
Does that mean that the bill we are reviewing at the moment is not a priority for you, but that if we were to make some interesting suggestions, you might act on them?