I'm in the middle of something. I'll deal with it when I'm finished.
The issue of repetition is not just with regard to your own presentation, it is with regard to what has been presented to the committee. The relevance is used to keep a member from straying from the question before the committee.
If you make a point that we are very busy at this committee and have other things to do, to go into how many meetings we've had on that and other things is not the main point. The main point is that the committee has other work. A point has been made. It shouldn't be made several times by a member. That's a matter of repetition. It may be relevant as a point, but it was repetitive, and that's why I raised it, Mr. Hiebert.
Let me just suggest to the committee that before us right now we have a minor amendment by Mr. Murphy, which would like to set a deadline of June 12 to have this matter dealt with. That's what we're debating now. I hope we can deal with that, with regard to whether or not a timeline is appropriate, is applicable, or has some problems with it. We'll see if we can get that, and then we can get back to the main motion.
Mr. Poilievre, on a point of order.