Let me finish. I have made a ruling on these matters on the basis of repetition and relevance. You are now getting into an argument against the ruling of the chair. Therefore, if you want to disagree with my ruling on that, the appropriate action is to challenge the ruling of the chair. To challenge the chair is not debatable, and we'd have to immediately put it to a vote.
The reason I've interfered with you is that you are giving an argument about why you disagree with my ruling. That's why I've interrupted you in this point of order.
I'll give you a couple more minutes to finish it off.