I can think of one set of hearings we had in which the tax information of a particular witness was very much at issue, and we were unable to discuss the sensitivity of it in any detail—but that may come another day.
Finally—this is more philosophical, and I can see it going both ways and want your brief opinion on it—for government to work, there has to be some disclosure of personal information. I can think of no instance where, in the private sector, they have to have information. If you want the privilege of getting a loan, you have to give information; that's fine, but I can think of no forced reason for it. Government is a little different.
On the other hand, our government is in a fiduciary relationship with us, so the care must be higher. Given that the government has to have some information but the relationship is much more a fiduciary one, I wonder whether the balance is that it should be the same standard as for the private sector, as is contemplated in PIPEDA, or do you think it should be held to a higher standard of notification?