The chair is telling me that my time is limited, and I have an additional question. So I'll leave that discussion aside for a moment.
Dealing with recommendation 9, on page 12, section H, the five-year statutory review, you suggest, without any explanation, that this committee review this legislation every five years. Now, you may or may not be aware, but we haven't reviewed this legislation in 25 years, and it's not likely that there would be a desire to do it as often as you suggest.
I'm wondering if you could help us understand why you think the time and expense would be necessary to review it every five years, keeping in mind that we understand that with PIPEDA things change frequently in the marketplace, and there's certainly a need to review that every five years. But with respect to this legislation and the less frequent change in how the public interacts with the government, what would be the value in reviewing it so often? Would it not suffice to do it less frequently?