Well, no, I think you're taking what I said and putting it into a context that I didn't offer. But that's not to say that what you're saying isn't true. Ultimately it may prove to be the case, but it's speculative in nature.
All I'm saying is that when you keep anyone in jail, the onus is on the jailer, the lawful authorities, to demonstrate justification for that. You can't just go on indefinitely keeping somebody in jail without exercising proper obligations towards that individual.
Yes, at some point, Mr. Schreiber may go to court and say he's been here all this time, and he's not going through the extradition, and he's entitled to have his liberty and get bail or something so he can live a normal life, I suppose. But I didn't mean to suggest that it would necessarily give rise to arguments in Germany. Maybe it would, maybe it wouldn't; I wouldn't know.