With regard to testimony, you also stated before the public accounts committee, and I quote:It cannot be referred to and used in other proceedings for any purpose whatsoever. It is fundamental that legal proceedings elsewhere cannot rely on, refer to, or cite testimony provided in the course of a parliamentary proceeding, and a committee proceeding is one of those.
Is it therefore the case that this committee study could evolve into a partisan political witch hunt with no particular purpose? Can you expand on your statement about not using the testimony before this committee for any other purpose, including a public inquiry?