Mr. Wallace, I'm going to let you rebut, have a second crack at me, but let me just finish off, because I think it's important.
We discussed that it's the intent of the committee that he should have had some time. It appears that he's not going to have very much time. The committee may decide that we want to keep him more, and it is the decision of the committee whether we want to go further. But I can assure you that the subpoena or the summons that I issued, that he'll appear no later than November 29 at 11 a.m. at a location to be determined, also includes the phrase, “and to remain in attendance until duly discharged”.
It basically means that this committee, under this document, can decide to call him back as long as it feels that it's important to have his testimony. That is still the committee's decision. We have not taken that decision, but it is up to the committee.