All right. So just to clarify, my next subamendment focuses only on the Van Kesteren amendment. It does not address the original Hubbard motion.
It reads:
...and to determine why Elections Canada has applied a double standard in sanctioning Conservative MPs and not any of the myriad of other MPs from the parties who have undertaken the same actions involving their past campaign expenses.
I think, Mr. Chair, if you'd look closely at this subamendment, it applies directly to the Van Kesteren amendment and not to Mr. Hubbard's main motion. If that's the standard for acceptability, I would hope that you would find it in order.