Listen, for the third time on the same issue--we dealt with one motion with the Liberals and the Bloc being included, then we just had the Liberals, and now we're putting this somewhere down at the bottom--the amendment as worded is simply inconsistent with the others, where it is trying to bring in another party.
When the motion itself mentions with regard to this event--if we can describe it that way--the “Conservative Party of Canada” and the refusal to “reimburse Conservative candidates”, you can't say including Liberal members who were public office holders, because they never were Conservative candidates. It doesn't make sense.
Therefore, the amendment is out of order.