Yes.
Evidence of meeting #41 for Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was going.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Evidence of meeting #41 for Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was going.
A recording is available from Parliament.
5:25 p.m.
Conservative
David Tilson Conservative Dufferin—Caledon, ON
Absolutely.
Mr. Proulx said that actions were carried out by one party and one party alone, namely the Conservative Party of Canada. He has no evidence about that. That's why the amendment and the subamendment, going back--not only the broadening of the proceedings for the amendment and the subamendment--would establish that the Liberal Party of Canada and the Bloc Québécois and the New Democratic Party weren't involved in those things.
That's what you're saying: you're saying that you're different. Well, you know--
5:25 p.m.
Conservative
David Tilson Conservative Dufferin—Caledon, ON
Okay. I'll look at you.
He's a good man to look at, but I'll look at you. I'll look at you. You're absolutely right; I won't look at him any more.
I'm finished, Mr. Chairman.
5:25 p.m.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo
Order.
Just a moment. I have something to say.
Mr. Tilson, thank you for your presentation and the cases. I've asked the clerk, and I think I'd like to see these.
5:25 p.m.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo
This point about the potential of prejudicing another proceeding also brought back to my memory that while the sponsorship inquiry was going on, the public accounts committee was doing an investigation of the sponsorship. I don't know whether they dealt with it, but I'm going to want to inquire or to find out how they rationalized doing that concurrent with an existing proceeding.
Thank you for the point. I think it's quite relevant.
Go ahead, Mr. Proulx.
5:25 p.m.
Liberal
Marcel Proulx Liberal Hull—Aylmer, QC
Yes. I wanted to move adjournment, Mr. Chair. It's nearly 5:30. This meeting was scheduled from 3:30 to 5:30.
I move that we adjourn.
5:25 p.m.
An hon. member
But we want to go on.
5:25 p.m.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo
The motion is not debatable; I have to put the question right now.
Do you want a recorded division, colleagues? We will have a recorded division, please.
(Motion agreed to: yeas 11; nays 0)
5:25 p.m.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo
Thank you, colleagues.
We are adjourned until Tuesday, when we are resuming debate on the subamendment.