Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'm actually getting to that, and I think what I'm speaking to is very relevant, since we're talking about expanding the scope. The subamendment talks about expanding the scope to include past elections. Obviously, if you're going to talk past elections, you have to talk sponsorship, and you have to talk about the illegal money, cash dollars, that flowed into Quebec ridings in Liberal associations. It's very relevant, and we should be looking into it. We don't know if there were even reports.... Well, I must assume that there weren't reports that indicated this money was spent on the campaigns, because, hopefully, Elections Canada wouldn't have provided rebates on stolen money. Therefore, we should be looking into this, expanding the scope to look at and see what the practice of those public office holders was.
We know that there were crimes committed. Unfortunately, none of the real perpetrators have ever been called to justice, in my opinion. But if we're going to look at this and we're going to look at--