Order. I understand that.
One of the rulings I made earlier has to do with the difference between providing evidence and what we do with witnesses, should we pass the motion to do this study, as opposed to debating the motion to do the study.
It's something the committee is going to have to address, the subamendment dealing with past elections. In this regard, it's going to be somewhat problematic, because I've read the Federal Court filings on this, and one of the keys here is that there were changes to the Canada Elections Act for the 2006 election campaign, and that will be very complicated. We're not going to be able to resolve that in a debate of the motion, amendment, and subamendment. That is more for expert witnesses. We may all have opinions on it--