Thank you.
I have asked members to keep to that. Mr. Wallace has made a point that the election law has changed. It could be significantly complicated to get into this, because you would have to have a lot of experts to remind you of what the law was back then, how it's changed, and the implications. Then you would have to have witnesses to tell you what they changed in their approach to dealing with election financing. It could be very significant.
I'm not exactly sure what that has to do with the ethical practices or the ethical standards met by public office-holders, but simply by the fact that we have this subamendment that refers to past elections, musing about past elections is in order.
I don't think we'd better go very much further, Mr. Wallace. I'm going to kind of saw off here. I think your point has been made, and maybe we should just move on. Okay?