Order, please. Order, please.
I need to make sure that members are clear here. There are two references to the ethical standards, if you put the motion, the amendment, and the subamendment all together.
The Hubbard motion has ethical standards as they relate to public office-holders, and those would be the ethical standards required of public office-holders in the act guiding the conflict of interest statement, not members of Parliament. This is where, if you look at the transcript of when Mr. Van Kesteren brought his amendment forward, I asked him and wanted him to clarify this thing, because he wanted this word “ethical” in there--ethical practices.
What your commentary is referring to is that maybe we should have some ethical standards in the Canada Elections Act, because you're taking that from Mr. Van Kesteren's amendment, whether these ethical practices.... This is the confusion. The members have to understand that the original motion was referring to the ethical standards expected of public office-holders per the Prime Minister's code of conduct for public office-holders. Okay?
Mr. Van Kesteren's—