Oh, it's after the words “by other parties or in past elections”; that's what we're actually debating right now.
But very clearly, from the outset it's completely disingenuous to say that this hasn't been about parties. It's most definitely about parties, because whenever we try to broaden the scope to bring other parties or candidates from other parties, the other parties block it, because the other parties have something to hide or something they don't want to talk about.
It's completely disingenuous to say that this can't be about parties, that it can only be about people. Well, if it's only about people, then I have a whole bunch of people whom I would say we have to be able to investigate, because we're not investigating parties, which means they can't protect their parties.