Thank you.
I do respect...or at least I hear the member opposite from the Bloc threatening to shut down debate. Again, Mr. Chair, this is exactly why this committee isn't qualified to hear the original motion.
The member opposite from the Bloc has demonstrated without a shadow of a doubt her inability to hear repetitive testimony, not to mention that she was mistaken on a number of her facts. I am absolutely sure that any court of law, even the smallest court in Canada, would have far more expertise, training, and patience to listen to all the evidence, however often it's given, and more importantly, Mr. Chair, to understand the evidence and, more important than that, to withhold judgment until the evidence is in.
However, the Bloc, interestingly enough, are not interested in the facts. What they're interested in is partisan political games so that they can attempt to raise their voting level in Quebec. But that's not going to happen, Mr. Chair.
I don't want to repeat anything, except, of course, when the Bloc members misunderstand. Whether it's interpretation...but I don't think so. I think the interpreters here on the Hill are excellent interpreters. I think what's happening is that there's a lack of attention span by the members opposite and they don't really--