It's not different, of course, Mr. Chair. The only difference is that with regard to Elections Canada--I don't want to bring it up, but I will in the context of how important it is to expand the motion--there is some suggestion and concern from people, some of whom are absolutely convinced, that Elections Canada may have acted inappropriately.
So what we need to do is not rely on Elections Canada's rulings. They've not always been correct, and we suggest they're not correct again. So we can't rely on Elections Canada. As the chair has pointed out, it's not within our mandate, and I completely concur with that. But what we need to do, of course, is have something to compare this with, some standard, some measuring stick. The only thing we can do is bring in other members. They may in fact be other members of the Conservative Party, but I suspect that what we're going to want to try to do is compare exactly what happened, day by day, whether it's inside a Federal Court affidavit, as I have before me right now, or it's examples that we've come to find out about in the interim.
The problem we have is that if we don't vote for this amendment...and I'm saying this with all sincerity. I have no problem with members getting up for coffee, but I am being very sincere right now. We can't do our jobs here unless we do them properly. This is becoming a joke. It's becoming a joke. And why would we do that?