Thank you.
The point of order was on a matter of relevance and repetition. They go together, as you know. I think the member is correct on this matter. We have talked about hypothetical cases of transfers. For the life of me, the Elections Canada issue is not about whether or not there were transfers; it's about whether someone exceeded the national advertising spending limit and engaged, or somehow had the involvement of, some of their candidates to make that happen.
The issue is a national party that...we're not dealing with that. But there are some members who have been named specifically. I know that we have these subamendments, but talking about hypotheticals of transfers is not helping us get to the point here.
So let's see if we can move on and speak to the motions, please.