So in effect we're dealing with money here that's been shuffled around. But the main point in all this apparently is that the chief financial agent of the Conservative Party avoid being accused of exceeding his election limit spending. Is that the correct interpretation of what this is all about?
When we look at things in terms of the national party, 50% of its spending is refunded to it by the federal government. In terms of candidates, 60% is refunded to the candidate or to his party. So really we're spending millions of dollars to contest in court 10% of $1.3 million--in other words, about $130,000. But the only reason for this being in court is that the chief financial agent of the Conservative Party will be accused of overspending and could be subject to heavy financial penalties and up to five years in prison under the act. Is that correct, Mr. Bernier?