I will say only two things. First of all, this is a matter that will be debated, I believe, in the Federal Court, and it will also be a matter for the investigation.
However, I will point out that the reference about alteration of invoices really came out for the first time, to my knowledge, when information became publicly available as a result of the search warrant application. That's all I can say. I'm not privy to the other matters in that regard.