That's one of the five reasons I mentioned, that is to say the fact that the commercial value of the transactions was not explained. For example, in a group of candidates, one of those candidates may be required to pay $3,000, whereas his neighbour may have to pay $15,000 for the same type of advertising and the same frequency, essentially. That leads me to conclude that the actual commercial value of those expenses is not being stated. I wait for the proof of that commercial value before I can authorize an expense. I wait to have the proof that that expense was incurred. That's what I asked of candidates; I asked to be informed of that.
On July 15th, 2008. See this statement in context.