Well, I know you have to be very careful and cautious in the language you use.
Okay. Number one, I think, is that what we see is a fairly obvious and deliberate conspiracy to exceed the spending limits. I'll say it, even if you can't.
The second thing, though, is the possibility of falsification of records. And let me bring it back to the mandate of the ethics committee. The filing of false election returns, of course, is a very serious matter. The official agents and the candidates themselves have to sign off on election returns; the content of these returns is accurate and the information found therein is true, to the best of their knowledge. That means that Maxime Bernier and Stockwell Day and Lawrence Cannon and other public office holders signed off on documents that you believe weren't true. They perhaps contained falsified information regarding the advertising purchase. Is that accurate?