Order.
Colleagues, the member has put forward a motion by which the committee, and it says it here clearly, would request that the Chief Electoral Officer appoint an independent investigator to review allegations of a leak, and that this investigation include all individuals who were privy to information about the search before the search occurred.
During the questioning, I believe Mr. Mayrand indicated that he'd be happy to look at whatever--there are five people now--and so on.
The motion is in order, because we can request anything we want, but we have no jurisdiction to mandate that this happen. The motion before us effectively says that the committee request that such a review be done. And the Chief Electoral Officer will consider our request.
I'm going to rule it in order, and I don't want any debate. I think it's fairly straightforward. It was discussed earlier. I'd simply like to put the question on this motion, as I read it, into the record. Would that be acceptable?
We'll have Mr. Martin on a point of order.