On a point of order, Chair, when you recalled to us the pertinent sections of Marleau and Montpetit on the issue of a point of order, there were three points: relevance, repetition, and procedural. My point of order goes to the issue of relevance.
Mr. Poilievre is making statements about electoral expense returns from the 2000 election and imputing the fact that there were court decisions that ruled the agreement between the Bloc and their candidates to be legal to be relevant to the issue at hand. However, the electoral financing act considerably amended the Canada Elections Act, and therefore, the sections that were ruled by the courts and deemed that the agreement between the Bloc Québécois and their candidates in 2000 was in fact legal and did not violate the Canada Elections Act and election financing are no longer pertinent because of the legislative amendments that have been brought to the entire regime.