In the outline Mr. Mayrand provided to us, he indicated that he would outline the factors affecting his decision, which he has done, and which he has reaffirmed in a number of questions. It would appear to me that the issue now being addressed to Mr. Mayrand is about the sourcing of those factors and about defending them, as opposed to just identifying them.
Mr. Mayrand has indicated that this is the substance of the court proceeding. The factors he took into account to sustain his decision not to reimburse those expenses are being dealt with in that Federal Court civil proceeding, the judicial review.
I believe Mr. Mayrand is quite correct; this is fundamental to the determination of that judicial body as to whether or not those reimbursements are there, so I will accept Mr. Mayrand's refusal to respond any further on that matter.
Mr. Hiebert, resuming, you have two and a half minutes to go.