Let me proceed with one other point then, and I will give the chair and the clerks leeway that the answers to these questions are in fact in that document. That's yet to be seen.
If members recall, Monsieur Mayrand said that in his investigation of the leak he spoke to a few people.
He spoke to a few people. He did not have records of it. That's not an investigation. That is simply asking a few of your buddies and not putting the metal to the fire, so to speak.
I think this is very serious business, and it should be looked into. And whoever made the leak, if in fact there was a leak, should be brought to account.
It was also mentioned by Monsieur Mayrand--and I can't quote him, but his quote is in the minutes--that he had significant concerns about the fact that the investigation undertaken by the commissioner, who invited the RCMP and apparently, allegedly, called up his Liberal buddies and said to come on over, we're going to do.... Mr. Mayrand expressed concern that it happened the day before these people were going to be questioned and disposed. So I think Mr. Mayrand himself expressed the need to look into this further.
The last point I would like to make is that it interests me significantly that between then and now Elections Canada has found a way to allow the Liberal leadership candidates to defer their repayment of their illegal loans. I just think there's too much going on here at Elections Canada to avoid any kind of investigation into this process. I had hoped the motion would have been expanded. I won't do that, but I absolutely feel that members here should vote for a proper investigation. If there was no leak, I'm sure members opposite will be really happy. If there was a leak--well, guess what?--you should be happy about that too.
That's my point, Mr. Chair. I will be supporting the motion.