If I may ask for the indulgence of the committee, the motion of Mr. Reid requests that Mr. Mayrand appoint an independent investigator. We don't have jurisdiction to instruct him to do that; it's not like a recommendation. Is that the understanding of members?
There is someone who could strike an independent investigator. If Mr. Mayrand picks his own investigator, I'm not sure whether that would meet the criterion of independence the members are proposing. It appears to me that it really is the Prime Minister, and I'm wondering if the recommendation really should be that the Prime Minister appoint an independent investigator to look at the leak, as opposed to asking Mr. Mayrand.
You trust him. That's okay, as long as members are aware of the subtlety here.