I'm glad you brought that up.
I have two points. One is that when I was reviewing or preparing for the appearance in this meeting, I saw that the excerpt from appendix 36—and paragraph 194 on page 47, I believe—was misattributed as being from me to Mike Donison. In actual fact, as I think we've pointed out here, it was from Mike Donison to me.
Now, in respect of that, his question from the chart that we supplied, which had the ridings and the medium and the dollars, was whether or not it should be the contribution. My response to that—which wasn't included in appendix 36—was that, no, he was looking at the wrong column. He needed to look at the column that was the media buy, the amount that we had transferred, and not the contribution. I was not suggesting that he utilize the contribution, which would have been more than the actual media buy.
We have copies of that in both languages, because it was confusing from the application, just showing my response, sir, if—