Thank you, Chair.
Not that any of us are keeping tally, but I believe there were 27 points of order on Wednesday, so I can understand how you're trying to do traffic control.
I actually was going to raise this on a point of order earlier, even before our break, but we didn't seem to get to that juncture. Mr. Goodyear initially started asking questions and he was referring to documents as court documents. He's gone back and referred to them and called them Elections Canada documents, but they're actually affidavits submitted by a Geoff Donald on behalf of the Conservative Party.
I'm just wondering, Mr. Mayrand, if you can confirm my understanding that this documentation was actually rejected as irrelevant by the prothonotary in the proceedings. Is that correct?