That was my exact point from my opening question about an hour and a half ago. So we've finally gone full circle.
So the only time Elections Canada will come to your department is when it's a serious case, meaning there are going to be prosecutions and they're ready to go. They know what the two criteria are. You've explained them to us and they know. You've enlightened us—you've enlightened everybody—but I think if it doesn't respond to the common good, there is no use prosecuting somebody, if we're talking about an expense report that wasn't signed or an official agent's name that was not on an advertisement. But in this case, it's obvious that Elections Canada has come and consulted with you.
My question is this. What is the action that's going to result from all this? Is anybody going to be thrown in jail, and is it going to be done within the next 12 months? That's what we'd like to know.