Right, I agree, and I think the chair in fact has informed the committee as such. He said basically—and I'm not putting words in your mouth, I'm saying what the chair said—that you would not appear in front of the committee unless you had this assurance that you in fact could not comment on matters or questions that pertain to the Federal Court case.
Actually, can I confirm that? Would you have appeared? If the chair had said no, you cannot invoke sub judice; you must answer all questions asked, no matter what they are, would you have come in front of the committee?