Yes, I understand that.
There are other witnesses who have not been treated the same, who have not been given the same deference to their requests in this matter. They have very valid concerns too. They have the same valid concerns that things they say could reflect upon the Federal Court case.
I think one of the points I'm trying to bring out here, particularly when it comes to this.... I'll start with sub judice. The chair basically cut you a deal. It's not a reflection on you; it's a reflection on the chair. He cut you a deal that was not offered to other witnesses. Other witnesses had no ability to take advantage of sub judice--only you. Oh, and then we found out today that the Public Prosecution Service of Canada could as well.
I don't know if you've been watching the proceedings. Have you been watching what's been going on this week?