Thank you, Mr. Martin.
I think that Mr. Schreiber understands that if it is clearly a question for which there is no justification to say “defer”, he would answer it, like his address or something like that.
If you have any reason to believe there is something in your papers--it might be just the precise date or something like that--we'll accept “defer”, but I'm going to allow members to ask for a confirmation of the reason for the deferral to allow Mr. Schreiber to explain, as he was trying to do for each and every one.
Some are obvious, on their face, that they are detailed enough--I suspect most members will be detailed enough--so I will allow you to say “defer” unless the members ask the chair to instruct you to give more detail of why you are deferring.
Would that be all right?