What I meant to say was that Mr. Reid, after six years in office, was requested by this committee to come up with a plan to restructure the act. I've got a copy and I've read it. At the time, Mr. Reid went back to first principles, the 31st article, the very title of the act, looked through it, and asked what changes we needed to make.
So it's a coordinated, synchronized, complete wall-to-wall review. And I know a member of Parliament has already reintroduced this bill. Your committee has supported the bill. Personally, I'm in support of the bill--not now because we've got bigger issues to look at. I would rather look at the act, the proposition made before your committee and now made before Parliament, in a constructive wall-to-wall review than doing it piecemeal. This piecemeal approach will not do anything in the short term, and I really have concerns that it may bring disequilibrium, if I can say that word, to the act in the long term.