With regard to the broad statement that it is the MPs, there is a standing order that requires a debate in the House on the Standing Orders—and the MP code is included in the Standing Orders as an appendix—to happen within the first 60 sitting days of the first session of a Parliament. It didn't happen in the last 39th Parliament; it was negotiated away for other reasons. It didn't happen in this Parliament because we didn't hit 60 sitting days in the current Parliament; we prorogued and had a second session. The MPs didn't get a chance to have any input into amendments to the Standing Orders or to the MP code. Maybe that should be one of your recommendations. If the MP code is going to be important, it should get scrutiny in every Parliament, regardless of the timing. It really is important.
I thought I'd raise that. It is a problem.
Madame Thi Lac, s'il vous plaît.