What we were recommending in New Brunswick was the integration, I guess, of our right to information legislation and our Protection of Personal Information Act, which are two stand-alone pieces. That's not the Canadian model. There's the federal model, but we sort of stand apart from the federal government in that respect.
We were actually looking and making recommendations for an informational privacy rights code, again bringing forward the fundamental human rights nature of the interests protected. At the same time, the ombudsman currently administers complaints under the Archives Act, and our only preoccupation there was that some attention should be given to the wording of proposed legislation and existing wording under the Archives Act to make sure that exemptions are carried forward. It's almost like a parallel regime, the right to information regime.
I think the creation of records is a legitimate concern for information commissioners, and I think Mr. Marleau's recommendations in terms of having a consultative role to Parliament in terms of legislation that may impact--like the National Archives Act, which may impact record holdings--is a good recommendation. It's the same type of recommendation that Mr. Justice La Forest made, and I think that's probably the process forward in terms of addressing those types of concerns.