This is probably my last question.
Along those lines, when I think about these individuals—these characters that legitimately are using the system because it's been made available to them, but they absorb half the time provided by the officers to fill their requests—in many respects these individuals are placing themselves into our Canadian story. They're part of the action; they're part of the players. I don't understand why, when people go to that extreme, their behaviour should not become available to the public. These individuals, who are so involved in our government, why shouldn't their story be made public? Why should their number of requests and the nature of their requests—but not their identity—not be ATIable?