Thank you, and thank you for recognizing that we weren't doing a comprehensive review of the entire act. This really, as you know, spawned out of the last series of report cards, in which there were some difficulties in some areas. These quick fixes are somewhat a split between administrative and legislative.
I'm not sure whether there is any consensus that could be reached, or whether or not any or all of these are going to have the intended results. But they do at least call for a more consistent and regular review. I don't know how you feel. Maybe in your answers to the members you can deal with such things as whether, if we did a five-year review, it would deal with the fact that we haven't had a serious review of the entire act. And how does that happen? It might be beyond the scope of a parliamentary committee that has other responsibilities; it takes up a fair a bit of resources and expertise.
I'm sure the members have lots of questions for you, so we're going to go right to those.
We're going to start with Mr. Wrzesnewskyj, please.