That provides a little clarity on that.
Contempt of Parliament, and that's a very serious charge, was mentioned several times. For clarity, and I wasn't absolutely sure, people referenced witnesses summoned who didn't appear. It was also mentioned that witnesses inadvertently or advertently may have misstated the facts in testimony before the committee. Is the contempt of Parliament that we'll be asking Mr. Walsh to inform us on a misrepresentation of facts by witnesses, or is it on non-appearance, or both?