I think the example of the Auditor General is very useful.
My understanding is that she goes four times a year. That would certainly give us more immediacy than once a year, because it ends up being a year and a half after things have happened. In this day and age, and especially to an electronic generation, you lose credibility about the message if you're reporting on it a year and a half later. People are living their news instantaneously now, so I'm concerned about shortening the time span between when things are happening and when, to be faithful to my mandate, I inform the public about them.