Thank you, Chair.
Welcome, and thank you for your efforts in working to help balance the rights of individuals and yet help us maintain our responsibility as parliamentarians, particularly with regard to issues of whether it's balancing personal and national security concerns.
In recommendation nine, you ask for the introduction of the provision regarding a five-year parliamentary review. Regretfully, I haven't spent any time on this committee, but I'm just wondering where this five years came from. Is that an arbitrary figure? Should it not be an ongoing procedure? Should it not almost be yearly rather than necessarily at five years? The world is changing so dramatically. We run into so many circumstances that could alter the provisions we have right now, whether it's cyber-terrorism, whatever. Why did you come up with the five years, and how comprehensive would you like to see this review be, and who should the participants be and how binding should it be?