I'm just wondering, because there are obviously some very serious security concerns at times, and I just wonder where that balance comes in between your responsibility to investigate circumstances where privacy can be breached and of course the necessity for the government and the state to protect the rights of its individuals. I just didn't know how far along that slope you go, and where the final decision-making sits as to what you are allowed to have and what you're not. Could you elaborate?
On May 11th, 2009. See this statement in context.