We both got the wrong name there.
There was another concern raised in the testimony we heard. I know two of our witnesses, Mr. Drapeau and Mr. Racicot, who appeared together, I believe, said they perceived that the United Nations saw Canada's ATI act as a model, but they couldn't show us any demonstration of that. I know that some other folks...including Toby Mendel of Halifax, who works with Article 19, a London-based human rights organization that focuses on freedom of information worldwide, who said that despite all of his work with UN human rights bodies, all the ones relevant to access to information, he can find no body that has any standard-making mandate that has adopted the Canadian model.
I'm just wondering if that corresponds to your experience. If countries were looking to establish an access to information or freedom of information regime, would they look to our law at this point in history as a model for how to do that?