Thank you.
David Fraser, from the Canadian Bar Association, said that when the ATI act--I'm quoting from his testimony--was originally introduced, it wasn't meant to be the only way that people could get access to information about what's happening in the government. It was meant to be a bit of a backup for general openness and transparency.
Would you agree with his assessment of how things have unfolded, that government now, rather than taking measures for openness and transparency, relies on the letter of the ATI law?