Thank you.
The colours tend to give you an overall picture of how the witnesses saw the particular recommendations. On recommendation 6, the advisory mandate to the Information Commissioner on proposed legislation in the legislative initiatives, it seems to have broad-based appeal, with the exception of two witnesses who essentially disagreed with almost every recommendation. It seems to appeal to all the witnesses. The minister remarks that it represents a departure from the usual process. If that were adopted as one of the initiatives, a departure from the usual process wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing. How would you see that enhancing it and making future changes to legislation easier than this process has been?