At the time that CAIRS was cancelled I did make a public statement that we disagreed with that position, and I think my assistant commissioner made a similar statement. We had been consulted much, much earlier and had made recommendations that if it was going to be discontinued, it should be replaced with something else, not just abandoned.
I made those statements and subsequently received a complaint. We are currently investigating it, so I want to be careful in going any further, except to point out that the Quebec jurisdiction has in law in its statute the duty to publish, and repositories have to be maintained. The U.K. statute has it as well.
It seems to me somewhat logical that at least government, if not users, would have a repository of what is being released. There would be efficiencies in the long term in that you don't ask for the same thing twice if you know it's already been published. But at this point I'd refrain from going any further because we do have an ongoing investigation.