In terms of costs, as I said, it's difficult to come up with a particular figure. What I've done is look at it in terms of low, medium, and high.
In the context of, say, number 4, I see that as low-cost because it allows me to manage the workload, and it may in fact reduce costs in terms of my office and it may reduce the workload in government departments. If a frequent user smothers a department with 500 requests in one day and then files 400 complaints with me, then I can step in and say, “Wait a minute. I'm not going to investigate those. That's not reasonable.” So there could be lower costs with that one.
Number 11 I see as kind of neutral, because the entire cost for fast-tracking to the court is borne by the users, not by the office and not by the department. It may increase the court costs that, let's say, a crown corporation might have to incur, because it's going to go there faster than the investigation, but chances are it's going to go there anyway, investigation or not.