I understand that, but the wording is “drawing” on work; it doesn't say exclusively.
But the motion is in order. The member has put this motion before the committee, with some explanation. I think the reasons were well explained, that there were other views such as those of the Auditor General, and certainly we would be familiar with those.
So the amendment posed by Mr. Poilievre, to add the part about the Auditor General's cautions, is in order. I would think members might like to deal with that now.