Well, I think the criterion would obviously be whether there was any potential conflict of interest, which isn't all that hard to figure out. We have to figure that out anyway when we're assessing the matter.
The fact that I can say that five posed a conflict and four were the other case suggests that it's a judgment call that we can make. That would be the main criterion, of course.
We have some difficult cases. My point there was that there's an awful lot of administration and churn spent over these difficult cases, and if there are only nine of them, there's less time that we have to spend on the difficult cases.